Traffic Congestion


An increasing problem in Sydney's Eastern Suburbs


What are the solutions ?


Hotspot :  Bondi /Bondi Beach


Hotspot : 

Maroubra has undergone a huge transformation in recent years with its 1km stretch of unspoilt beach and renowned surf culture serving as a massive drawcard for the area. With a strong sense of community, Maroubra is one of the less transient of the east’s beachside suburbs with locals tending to live their whole lives in the suburb. It’s a great place to raise a family with acres of parkland, good schools and Pacific Square’s retail hub ensuring you never really have to leave.


Local Real Estate Agent Paul Stout lives there but services ALL OF EASTERN SUBURBS TEL 0430 000 430

BONDI PAVILION SO CALLED RE DEVELOPMENT ?!


Bondi Pavilion : Libs when in control Wav Council already messed this up ?! Now Labs/Greens about to do same ? Craven attitude “ we know what’s best for you Waverley ratepayers” Bucket list and Community Amphitheater to go ??!...


Yes by all means restore the building to its old self ...but this craven attitude  " we know whats best fo you ratepayers"on the part of some council staff and Councillors exemplified by the above really gets up some local residents /rate payers noses


CAR CONGESTION IN BONDI  


 OXFORD UNI Prof Eliz Fisher interesting parallel as to her Oxford St Congested ! That’s why we need laws ! Thought occurred that’s why we need laws to control number of cars coming into Bondi and London style congestion tax?! = analogy why need Climate Reg laws?!








DOUBLE BAY  - DEVELOPERS A PROBLEM FOR LOCAL RESIDENTS ?


BY GEORGIA FULLERTON in  BONDI VIEW  ! - Great recommended article !

"The Bay Village Arcade at 28-34 Cross Street will go before the Sydney Eastern City Planning Panel on October 4. Woollahra Council has invited members of the public to attend these meetings, they can register to verbally present a summary of their submissions before a decision is made.

Senior Communications Officer for Woollahra Council, Matt Frillingos, said: “Council advertised the development applications to public for comment. Residents with concerns regarding these development applications had the opportunity to make submissions by way of objection. These submissions were taken into account in terms of merit assessment by Council’s planning officer, and tabled in a report to the Sydney Eastern Planning Panel.”

The land is now owned by SJD group, led by by Shanghai-based developer Shi Jiandong, who bought the land for $45 million.

SJD is already building apartments at 20-26 Cross Street, the “1788 residences”, being sold off the plan by Ray White Double Bay.

Documents submitted to Woollahra Council say the proposed arcade development “is of a height and scale that achieves the desired future character of the neighbourhood” at 21.21m high, the building is over the height limit of 14.7m.

In addition to this, developers set their sights on 55 Bay street, to build a seven level mixed retail tower.

Another six-storey 20.3 million development proposal, at 21-27 Bay street, is also over the height limit at 21.6m. It is comprised of 23 units plus ground floor retail. Current tenants of the site include The Bridal Atelier and Smarta Laundries.

Vice president of Double Bay Residents Association, Malcolm Young, said there a variety of factors that pose a threat to the area: “Views will be lost both from existing residences and from those of us on the surrounding amphitheatre who look across the Centre to the Harbour. A number of these pending development applications also reduce the commercial business space in the Centre replacing it with units from 1st floor up to the detriment of employment and services in the area.”

Double Bay has experienced the lowest retail trading period in decades following the loss of 200 office workers from the village. Council responded to this with a move to prevent developers from cutting commercial space in favour of more profitable residential space.

Mr. Young said: “Such development so close to the harbour is contrary to the general planning principle that you put higher buildings on ridges, not on the flat where they impede views.”

Development in the Double Bay Centre is controlled by the Woollahra Local Environment Plan of and the Woollahra Development Control Plan.The area has a height limit of four storeys, five storeys for certain sites. There is also in place a floor space ratio of 2.5:1. These controls were subject to community consultation before they were finalised.

A petition was put to Council by 410 residents and over 70 residents from surrounding suburbs to stop an increase on these height and bulk controls.

Mr Young Said: “Our association opposed and continues to oppose development applications which seriously breach these controls. Sadly, some were passed by the last Council, contrary to staff recommendations for refusal. If that trend were to continue, instead of the Centre having a sunny, strollable village character where people like to sit at a pavement cafe in the sunshine and shop in specialty shops, its lanes and streets will become a dark, windy and soulless place surrounded by six and seven storey buildings.”

Mr. Young argues that there are also technical reasons why the development would be a detriment to the area: “Parking in and around the Centre is a nightmare for residents. Traffic through the Centre towards and from the city is a snarl. All these new apartment blocks should certainly provide for the parking needs they generate, but therein lie the technical problems about excavating in the Centre. The subsoil contains acid sulphates which are a danger to both person and property. Furthermore the Centre has an aquifer running under it which generates a water table only just below ground level.”

On June 14, The Sydney Eastern City Planning Panel recently refused a seven-storey apartment building proposed for the corner of Bay Street and Guilfoyle Avenue. The building would have housed 39 units, with space for 33 parking spaces. It was refused as it did not comply with height controls and that the loss of commercial use would be detrimental to the Double Bay Centre.



HOTSPOT ! RUSHCUTTERS BAY !

Rushcutters Bay on the nose

Posted April 24, 2019 by Mitch Hitch & filed under Bondi View, Featured Bondi View.


BY ALANA LEVENE

Sydney Water is urging residents to watch what they’re flushing down their toilets after a recent sewer blockage caused wastewater to drain into Rushcutters Bay, blocking the area to swimmers for weeks.

This is the fourth choke in the in Paddington area since the beginning of November, according to a Sydney Water spokesperson. The chokes happen when people flush rags, wet wipes and other materials that don’t belong down the drain.

“People need to understand that the wastewater system is not a rubbish disposal and that anything other than what it’s designed for has to be removed so that it doesn’t end up in the environment,” a Sydney Water spokesperson said.

The organisation initially advised the community of the contamination on 8 April. The advisory remained active on 23 April, a spokesperson confirmed, even though the choke had been cleared.

In the meantime, the Water Department is asking people to avoid swimming due to the lingering possibility of pollution.

Sewage overflows common

Sewer overflows occur frequently across Sydney, particularly after heavy rainfall, when the sewage system becomes overloaded.

“It is fairly common when we have heavy rain events,” said Michelle Rose, an environmental education officer for the Woollahra Council.

As a general precaution, swimming in Sydney Harbour is discouraged for up to three days after rainfall or for as long as stormwater is present. If there are signs of water pollution, like discoloured water, odour, oil, scum, or floating debris, swimming should be avoided.

“This is a real problem for Sydney Water,” said a Sydney Water spokesperson, “which is why our ‘Clean up not down’ campaign stresses that we should always use a rubbish bin and not dispose of wipes or any other bathroom products down the toilet.”

This also includes tissues, the spokesperson said.

This is not a problem unique to Sydney, according to Dr Serena Blyth Lee, who has constructed hydrodynamic models of water movement in the Sydney Harbour.

Sections of Sydney’s complex sewerage infrastructure are old. With age comes maintenance problems, said Lee.

“Older components of the infrastructure may not have been designed to carry the present population load,” Lee said. “Like roads, the network has likely been retrofitted to widen pipes etcetera, but as with any large infrastructure, upon which we rely, this has to be done a piece at a time.”

There are several overflow points at which sewage can overflow into the stormwater network.

Since Rushcutters Bay isn’t a well-flushed locality, among other factors, overflow and subsequent contamination will likely continue with current rates of sewage discharge, according to Gavin Birch, an expert on pollutants in the Sydney Harbour. This is because it is located a few kilometres away from the estuary mouth.

“The most likely issue related to sewage contamination would be faecal coliform virus,” Birch said.

“E. coli — which is a type of faecal coliform bacteria — triggers beach and bay closings,” Lee said.

The signage will remain in place likely until e. coli concentrations, or other bacteria capable of affecting human health, fall below the acceptable limit for a few successive days,” Lee said. “Daily monitoring is likely taking place to monitor these concentrations.”

The warning will be in effect as a precaution until the test results come back completely clear. A Sydney Water spokesperson could not say on Tuesday whether faecal coliform bacteria is present in Rushcutters Bay.

“The results from the most recent testing show dissolved oxygen levels are typical, which would indicate no impacts to the aquatic environment,” the spokesperson said.

The organisation ordered a CCTV inspection of the wastewater pipe to identify blockages and faults, and analyse the current system’s performance.

“Sydney Water takes its responsibility to protect public health and the environment seriously,” the spokesperson said.

Continuing to monitor

“Sydney is blessed with one of the most beautiful harbours in the world,” Birch wrote back in 2007 in a book chapter that outlined Sydney’s geological and environmental history.

“However, like many large, capital ports world-wide, this environment has been exposed to relentless stress due to a rapidly increasing population density and extensive residential, commercial and industrial expansion,” he wrote.

Since 1972, the Clean Waterways Act has controlled discharge into the Harbour’s estuaries. Since 1990, sewage has been dispersed into the sea about four kilometres from the coast, according to Birch.

Sydney Water is also continually conducting water tests to detect sewage.

To avoid future blockages, the organisation says that nothing should be going down sinks and toilets other than wastewater.

For the sinks, no fats oils, and greases, the spokesperson said. And for the toilet, “that’s the 3Ps: only Pee, Poo and Paper.”



BONDI BEACH POST OFFICE TO GO ?  - LATEST "CORPORATISATION VICTIM?


* Although the relevant planning panel recently rejected an application to Re develop this site the article below is still very aposite as the risk still remains ................


Bondi Beach Post Office  may still be facing closure long term ............... the site was sold so how long will AusPosts' Lease last....?


Australia Post is still insisting that “we are committed to the local community,” but with the local community saying NO, that’s looking increasingly difficult to believe, even though Australia Post promises to retain all its product services in Bondi Beach.
“You’re not serving the community: you’re helping destroy it” was the clear message from a recent meetting / rally outside the Bondi Beach Post Office.

That meeting was addressed by much-loved local resident Michael Caton. He played a key role in the Bondi Pavilion battle which saw local Liberals thrown out of power in last September’s elections.
At the rally, Mayor John Wakefield said that former mayor Sally Betts had stripped development decisions from Waverley councillors and provided a glowing example that the State government used to sell the compulsory change to other councils.
He said that the failed attempt by Baird/Berejiklian to abolish local councils was the Liberal’s thank-you gift to the state’s property developers, and that people have seen it and they’ve had enough!

The application assumes that the land around the building will be sold, but the Post Office building with its land is actually owned by the Australian Government, that is, by Australians. With the surrounding planters and open space being owned and so intensively used by the public, there’s an argument that the area functions as Bondi’s Public Square, and that it ought not be sold off as if it were just another bit of commercial land.

Hall Street’s footpaths widen out in this area and the result is a small but perfectly formed public plaza. With the modest Post Office elegantly echoing the classical architecture of the Pavilion, this is a local area that beautifully counter-balances the massive public open space of Bondi Beach. It’s far too good to lose.

Down on Campbell Parade height restrictions and heritage controls have meant that Bondi’s main strip has mostly avoided the blight of crass high-rise over-development that’s afflicted much of Australia’s East coast. But recent approval of a nasty glitzy block of (what else?) ultra luxury flats on the corner of Ramsgate Avenue looks like a planning blunder, and hopefully one of the last.
The developers (Elia Leis and Andrew Starr’s StarGate Property Group) are responsible for the elliptical tower at the top of Bondi Road and have been pushing the highly controversial West Oxford Street development.
The approved building on Campbell Parade will rise almost 16 metres above the controls of 12.5 metres, and block the sun that shines on those tanned torsos and rippling pecs of North Bondi’s legendary Muscle Beach gym.

Property development may not be entirely a zero-sum game, but all of Sydney’s inner suburbs are now so densely packed that pretty well every new development robs other residents of their sunlight, views, trees, etc.
In the Eastern Suburbs particularly, this is a very real everyday tale of winners and losers. The fact is that if you build and get a view, you’ll have taken that view from someone else.
Not that local Councils or their planning departments seem terribly interested. Stargate’s application for the Campbell Parade proposal scandalously argued that Waverley Council had effectively abandoned its own development controls in Bondi Beach, and that therefore this extra height was perfectly acceptable. It’s a measure of how much power Sydney’s development industry has taken from elected-and therefore accountable-officials.

 

DANGEROUS WELLINGTON ST AND BONDI RD INTERSECTION BONDI 

Sat 24 Nov 2018 ! DANGEROUS INTERSECTION CNR WELLINGTON ST & BONDI RD Two more potentially dangerous accidents avoided today alone at this DAngerous intersection ⁉️💥🇦🇺💩💩 No 1 vehicle turning right from Wellington St nearly collided with car 🚘 in Bondi Rd ! No 2 Motorcyclist nearly hit turning right into Bondi Rd(recently another motorcyclist lost his leg)

Pls see
www.sydneyeasternsuburbsview.com

And See www.sydneyeasternsuburbsview.com.au

WHEN will Inneffectual Local State MP Gabriel Upton , Waverley Council and NSW Roads and Mar Services Dept do something effective about this - Opp Bus stop , near Bondi Pub school - few years ago a right turning car mounted the footpath and went through a shopfront (where) Spa Grocery is now - disaster waiting to happen ! V high pedestrian 🚶‍♀️ traffic area


WATSONS BAY AN SOUTH HEAD UNDER THREAT ?


Another great article by Bondi Views ' Georgia Fullerton !

New Function centre Wedding Function area and development in part of National Park













West Bondi Twin-Tower Development


BY VANESSA LIM COURTESY BONDI VIEW "


The proposed 11-storey twin-tower building at West Bondi has been recommended to the NSW Department of Planning, despite public disapproval.


The Independent Planning Commission has advised the NSW Department of Planning to proceed to the finalisation of the Stargate Property Group’s luxury apartment development.

But this proposal has received backlash from locals such as Catharine Munro, who manages the Facebook page “Save West Bondi Junction”. Ms Munro said, “We have been fighting this for seven years and the response from the community has consistently been strong opposition to it”.

Proposal twice rejected

This plan is also rejected by Waverly’s Labor Mayor John Wakefield, who said, “Council has twice rejected this development proposal. We continue to lobby the State Government to reject it. During the week I have again written to the Minister on behalf of impacted residents to seek his refusal of the project”.

A major concern that locals have voiced is the impact it will have on Centennial Park. Munro said, “When you’re standing in the park with the beautiful tree skyline and no buildings you feel like you’re out in nature, but that’ll be destroyed as you’ll have the block of apartments in the skyline. There’s also overshadowing in the corner of the park”.

With the developer’s proposal, the current height limit of four storeys will increase by 2.4 times.

Munro said, “In cities there are plans that limit heights so that you don’t end up with really unpleasant urban landscapes”.

The four terrace heritage sites have also raised concern for locals. Mill Hill Bondi Junction committee member Ilana Cohen said, “Other issues are that they will take the heritage protection off the terraces, this could set a precedent, and a mass clearing of the terraces in the area could start.”

There is also worry that when a couple of high-rise buildings are developed, other landowners will soon follow suit.

Munro said, “If he does that just for his land, other landowners will come out and say ‘Well we want the height limits changed for our land too because he got it so why can’t we? That’s where people are concerned.”

Mill Hill Bondi Junction committee member Georgia Koutsandrea has experienced the effects of urbanisation in Bondi.

She said, “I have lived in Bondi Junction for the last eight years and experienced first-hand the gradual worsening of these issues as the high rises have gone up”.

This potential domino effect isn’t the only thing the community is worried about. Chris Matthews from the Bondi Resident Action Group said, “Insufficient data collected on traffic impacts to Oxford Street, especially in light of the recently approved community cycleway, will further narrow this already overly busy intersection (cnr of York Road, Oxford Street and Syd Einfeld Drive). This is the main exit/entrance to Waverley Bus Depot, (itself under threat)”.

But local council and community efforts opposing the proposal, due to its negative impacts, have been disregarded by the NSW Department of Planning.

Munro said, “When a bureaucrat as opposed to a politician gets told to assess a proposal, they have to have parameters for assessing it. Their guidelines are about putting lots of high rise close to public transport. So if that’s your main consideration for assessing this proposal it gets a big tick. But when you take into account environment, heritage, community needs and traffic impact, it’s a bigger picture that needs more consideration”.

Chris Matthews also voiced his concern about the approval process. He said, “Since the current State Government took the planning powers from local councils in August 2017, the rate of developments in Bondi Junction and all over Sydney has accelerated significantly.

“Although some change is inevitable with the growth of our populations, it should not be at the expense of the existing suburban population. The current government is driving change at such a rapid rate that there is a cost associated with this process, the degradation of our happiness and our homes.”

Questionable guidelines

Munro said, “Power taken away from the local community, that is of major concern, but we also just need good analysis and assessment.”

She cited the questionable guidelines.

“What’s happened is that they’ve had narrow guidelines for considering it and perhaps guidelines that aren’t all that relevant. These are luxury apartments where everyone will own a car and probably not need public transport.”

The NSW Labor and Greens have both agreed to review the approval process but NSW Liberals have yet to take action.